<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1068 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176563</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of KJMC Corporate Advisors (India) Limited from comparables, citing functional differences with the assessee&#039;s investment advisory services. Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Pvt. Ltd. was also excluded due to dissimilarity in activities. The Assessing Officer/TPO was directed to adjust the arm&#039;s length price accordingly. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1068 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176563</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of KJMC Corporate Advisors (India) Limited from comparables, citing functional differences with the assessee&#039;s investment advisory services. Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Pvt. Ltd. was also excluded due to dissimilarity in activities. The Assessing Officer/TPO was directed to adjust the arm&#039;s length price accordingly. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>