<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1067 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176562</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of Rs. 12,39,11,827 under section 40(a)(ia) as the TDS was paid before the return filing due date. The amendment to section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010 was considered retrospective from 1.4.2005, covering the relevant assessment year. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing adherence to higher judicial decisions and the retrospective application of curative amendments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 23:11:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1067 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176562</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of Rs. 12,39,11,827 under section 40(a)(ia) as the TDS was paid before the return filing due date. The amendment to section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010 was considered retrospective from 1.4.2005, covering the relevant assessment year. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing adherence to higher judicial decisions and the retrospective application of curative amendments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>