<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1073 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176577</link>
    <description>The ITAT remitted all issues back to the AO for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need to verify the deductibility of amounts under relevant sections. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions due to lack of detailed discussions on deductibility and directed reevaluation in accordance with the law, granting the assessee a fair opportunity to present its case. The ITAT allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, stressing compliance with legal provisions and thorough examination of eligibility for deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 23:11:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1073 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176577</link>
      <description>The ITAT remitted all issues back to the AO for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need to verify the deductibility of amounts under relevant sections. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions due to lack of detailed discussions on deductibility and directed reevaluation in accordance with the law, granting the assessee a fair opportunity to present its case. The ITAT allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, stressing compliance with legal provisions and thorough examination of eligibility for deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>