<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1071 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176575</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on MS Channels, MS Angles, MS Plates, MS Flats, MS Beams and HR Coils was not finally decided on merits, as the appeals were remanded for reconsideration. The adjudicating authority was directed to re-examine the credit claim in the light of the cited decisions and after giving the assessee a further hearing on facts and law. No conclusive finding was recorded on admissibility of credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2015 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1071 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176575</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on MS Channels, MS Angles, MS Plates, MS Flats, MS Beams and HR Coils was not finally decided on merits, as the appeals were remanded for reconsideration. The adjudicating authority was directed to re-examine the credit claim in the light of the cited decisions and after giving the assessee a further hearing on facts and law. No conclusive finding was recorded on admissibility of credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>