https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176581 The Karnataka Value Added Tax appeal pre-deposit requirement was treated as capable of being met by a bank guarantee where insisting on cash deposit was considered onerous and adequate security could be secured without affecting the appellate process. The dispute on tax liability was left for adjudication on merits, and the appellate remedy remained intact pending decision in accordance with law. Complete waiver of the statutory condition was not granted, but interim relief was given by allowing substitution of the cash deposit with a bank guarantee. en-us Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Dec 2015 23:11:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176581 The Karnataka Value Added Tax appeal pre-deposit requirement was treated as capable of being met by a bank guarantee where insisting on cash deposit was considered onerous and adequate security could be secured without affecting the appellate process. The dispute on tax liability was left for adjudication on merits, and the appellate remedy remained intact pending decision in accordance with law. Complete waiver of the statutory condition was not granted, but interim relief was given by allowing substitution of the cash deposit with a bank guarantee. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176581