<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1217 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176585</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the addition of Rs. 6,58,965 as income related to the rice bran price difference. The court concluded that the authorities were unjustified in adding income based on the price difference of rice bran purchased and sold. The appeal was allowed, and the appellant succeeded in challenging the deemed additional sale price assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1217 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176585</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the addition of Rs. 6,58,965 as income related to the rice bran price difference. The court concluded that the authorities were unjustified in adding income based on the price difference of rice bran purchased and sold. The appeal was allowed, and the appellant succeeded in challenging the deemed additional sale price assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>