<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CIT Revises Assessment u/s 263 Due to AO&#039;s Inadequate Inquiry; Section 68 Proviso Applied Retrospectively.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26585</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - AO did not make befitting inquiry in the given circumstances and the CIT has held the assessment order to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue - order of revision and additions confirmed - insertion of proviso to section 68 is retrospective. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 13:52:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 13:52:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CIT Revises Assessment u/s 263 Due to AO&#039;s Inadequate Inquiry; Section 68 Proviso Applied Retrospectively.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26585</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - AO did not make befitting inquiry in the given circumstances and the CIT has held the assessment order to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue - order of revision and additions confirmed - insertion of proviso to section 68 is retrospective. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 13:52:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>