<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refund Granted: Duty Paid Under Protest Not Passed to Consumers, No Unjust Enrichment Found During Adjudication Proceedings.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26578</link>
    <description>Refund - Unjust enrichment - duty was paid under protest during the pendency of the adjudication proceedings - there was no question of passing on this element of duty to consumers/buyers. - Refund cannot be denied - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 12:01:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 12:01:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Refund Granted: Duty Paid Under Protest Not Passed to Consumers, No Unjust Enrichment Found During Adjudication Proceedings.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26578</link>
      <description>Refund - Unjust enrichment - duty was paid under protest during the pendency of the adjudication proceedings - there was no question of passing on this element of duty to consumers/buyers. - Refund cannot be denied - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 12:01:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>