<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 835 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176541</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and all connected appeals, underscoring the necessity for consistency in tax assessments. It ruled that the Revenue cannot selectively challenge ITAT orders without valid justification, especially when earlier orders were accepted. The decision emphasized maintaining established views unless there is a justifiable cause for deviation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 17:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 835 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176541</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and all connected appeals, underscoring the necessity for consistency in tax assessments. It ruled that the Revenue cannot selectively challenge ITAT orders without valid justification, especially when earlier orders were accepted. The decision emphasized maintaining established views unless there is a justifiable cause for deviation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>