<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1234 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269930</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against CIT (A)&#039;s direction to adopt 6% profit from transactions in loose sheets during a survey was dismissed. The loose sheets listed cash purchases totaling &amp;amp;8377; 2,15,05,363 from 37 parties, with the AO confirming sales to the assessee. The AO treated the cash purchases as unexplained investment under section 69 of the Act, adding the amount to the income. CIT (A) limited the addition of unaccounted cash purchases to 6% profit, excluding duplicate bills and amounts from unconfirmed parties. The Tribunal upheld CIT (A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing the lack of stock variation indicating the purchases were sold, justifying the estimated profit from unaccounted sales.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 13:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1234 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269930</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against CIT (A)&#039;s direction to adopt 6% profit from transactions in loose sheets during a survey was dismissed. The loose sheets listed cash purchases totaling &amp;amp;8377; 2,15,05,363 from 37 parties, with the AO confirming sales to the assessee. The AO treated the cash purchases as unexplained investment under section 69 of the Act, adding the amount to the income. CIT (A) limited the addition of unaccounted cash purchases to 6% profit, excluding duplicate bills and amounts from unconfirmed parties. The Tribunal upheld CIT (A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing the lack of stock variation indicating the purchases were sold, justifying the estimated profit from unaccounted sales.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>