<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1228 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269924</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT&#039;s direction to re-do the assessment due to the A.O.&#039;s failure to verify purchase details and transport expenditure. The ITAT modified its order to ensure proper verification of details before re-doing the assessment, addressing mistakes apparent from the record and ensuring justice for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:10:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1228 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269924</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT&#039;s direction to re-do the assessment due to the A.O.&#039;s failure to verify purchase details and transport expenditure. The ITAT modified its order to ensure proper verification of details before re-doing the assessment, addressing mistakes apparent from the record and ensuring justice for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>