<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1225 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269921</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of proper recording of satisfaction by the AO of the searched person before issuing notices under section 153C. The Tribunal found the satisfaction note to be vague and lacking essential details, leading to the quashing of the assessment order. The decision highlighted the necessity for adherence to procedural requirements to maintain the validity of notices issued under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:10:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1225 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269921</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of proper recording of satisfaction by the AO of the searched person before issuing notices under section 153C. The Tribunal found the satisfaction note to be vague and lacking essential details, leading to the quashing of the assessment order. The decision highlighted the necessity for adherence to procedural requirements to maintain the validity of notices issued under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>