<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1213 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269909</link>
    <description>Refund applications were directed to be decided in accordance with law by a speaking order after granting an opportunity of hearing. If any amount was found payable, it had to be released within the stipulated time. The writ petition was thus disposed of on the basis of procedural fairness in the refund process, with emphasis on reasoned decision-making and timely disbursal of any admissible refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:08:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1213 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269909</link>
      <description>Refund applications were directed to be decided in accordance with law by a speaking order after granting an opportunity of hearing. If any amount was found payable, it had to be released within the stipulated time. The writ petition was thus disposed of on the basis of procedural fairness in the refund process, with emphasis on reasoned decision-making and timely disbursal of any admissible refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>