<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1212 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269908</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petition, citing the doctrine of forum conveniens and stating that the Bombay High Court was the appropriate forum for the action. The Court did not address the merits of the impugned orders or the availability of alternative remedies, advising the parties to present their arguments before the suitable forum. The petition was discharged without any cost orders issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:08:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1212 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269908</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petition, citing the doctrine of forum conveniens and stating that the Bombay High Court was the appropriate forum for the action. The Court did not address the merits of the impugned orders or the availability of alternative remedies, advising the parties to present their arguments before the suitable forum. The petition was discharged without any cost orders issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>