<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1210 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269906</link>
    <description>The High Court found the writ petition challenging the dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition to be not maintainable as the original stay order was not challenged, leading to the finality of the pre-deposit order. The Court emphasized that once the conditional stay order becomes final, the dismissal for non-compliance cannot be separately challenged. The Court dismissed the writ petition and the connected miscellaneous petition without costs. Additionally, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to apply the amendment for pre-deposit, considering the appellant&#039;s admission to clandestine removal of goods, and dismissed the civil miscellaneous appeal and connected petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:08:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1210 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269906</link>
      <description>The High Court found the writ petition challenging the dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition to be not maintainable as the original stay order was not challenged, leading to the finality of the pre-deposit order. The Court emphasized that once the conditional stay order becomes final, the dismissal for non-compliance cannot be separately challenged. The Court dismissed the writ petition and the connected miscellaneous petition without costs. Additionally, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to apply the amendment for pre-deposit, considering the appellant&#039;s admission to clandestine removal of goods, and dismissed the civil miscellaneous appeal and connected petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>