https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269894 A stay of an order revoking a CHA licence could not be granted under Rule 41 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, because such relief would in substance restore the licence and amount to allowing the appeal at the interim stage. The Tribunal held that Rule 41 confers only limited powers to make orders necessary to give effect to its orders, prevent abuse of process, or secure the ends of justice. Since it does not authorise interim restoration of a revoked CHA licence, the requested stay was beyond the Tribunal's jurisdiction. en-us Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 May 2016 10:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269894 A stay of an order revoking a CHA licence could not be granted under Rule 41 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, because such relief would in substance restore the licence and amount to allowing the appeal at the interim stage. The Tribunal held that Rule 41 confers only limited powers to make orders necessary to give effect to its orders, prevent abuse of process, or secure the ends of justice. Since it does not authorise interim restoration of a revoked CHA licence, the requested stay was beyond the Tribunal's jurisdiction. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269894