<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1213 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176516</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, maintaining the demand for confirmed amounts while upholding the Commissioner&#039;s decision on the time bar issue. The judgment emphasizes the importance of clear evidence to support related party transaction allegations and timely issuance of show cause notices in excise duty cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 22:41:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1213 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176516</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, maintaining the demand for confirmed amounts while upholding the Commissioner&#039;s decision on the time bar issue. The judgment emphasizes the importance of clear evidence to support related party transaction allegations and timely issuance of show cause notices in excise duty cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>