<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1060 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176526</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision allowing input service credit on construction service and rent-a-cab service. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming that Cenvat credit for construction service was available for building a factory under Rule 2(I) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Additionally, input service credit for rent-a-cab service was upheld as it was deemed necessary for transporting employees and official purposes, following a decision of the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Bombay. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on legal provisions and precedents, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 22:41:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1060 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176526</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision allowing input service credit on construction service and rent-a-cab service. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming that Cenvat credit for construction service was available for building a factory under Rule 2(I) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Additionally, input service credit for rent-a-cab service was upheld as it was deemed necessary for transporting employees and official purposes, following a decision of the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Bombay. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on legal provisions and precedents, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>