<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1058 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176524</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was eligible for Cenvat credit for C&amp;amp;F agent service based on precedent, setting aside the demand. However, the appellant was deemed ineligible for Cenvat credit for commission agent service, with the credit deemed inadmissible. The matter regarding the eligibility for Cenvat credit on erection, installation, and commissioning service was remanded for further discussion by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 22:41:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1058 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176524</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was eligible for Cenvat credit for C&amp;amp;F agent service based on precedent, setting aside the demand. However, the appellant was deemed ineligible for Cenvat credit for commission agent service, with the credit deemed inadmissible. The matter regarding the eligibility for Cenvat credit on erection, installation, and commissioning service was remanded for further discussion by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>