<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 38 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1626</link>
    <description>Mere physical separation of ilmenite, rutile and zircon from beach sand by magnetic, electrostatic and gravity processes did not amount to manufacture because no chemical or physical transformation occurred and no new commercially distinct product emerged. The minerals therefore continued to be classifiable as ore concentrates, and denial of exemption under Notification No. 4/97-C.E. was not sustainable. On that basis, the duty demands were set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 38 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1626</link>
      <description>Mere physical separation of ilmenite, rutile and zircon from beach sand by magnetic, electrostatic and gravity processes did not amount to manufacture because no chemical or physical transformation occurred and no new commercially distinct product emerged. The minerals therefore continued to be classifiable as ore concentrates, and denial of exemption under Notification No. 4/97-C.E. was not sustainable. On that basis, the duty demands were set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>