<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 994 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176497</link>
    <description>Although the statute prescribed no express time-limit for restoration applications, the Tribunal applied its settled practice, affirmed by the Bombay High Court, that such applications must be filed within three months of dismissal of the appeal. As the application was filed after that period and no further extension had been granted, the Tribunal treated it as time-barred and dismissed it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 21:59:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 994 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176497</link>
      <description>Although the statute prescribed no express time-limit for restoration applications, the Tribunal applied its settled practice, affirmed by the Bombay High Court, that such applications must be filed within three months of dismissal of the appeal. As the application was filed after that period and no further extension had been granted, the Tribunal treated it as time-barred and dismissed it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>