<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 998 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176493</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a customs classification dispute regarding imported goods initially declared as Polyester Ladies Stole. The Revenue&#039;s argument for classification under CTH 62149060 lacked concrete evidence of manmade fiber presence, leading the Tribunal to dismiss their claim. Additionally, the Tribunal emphasized the Revenue&#039;s failure to prove the presence of manmade fiber, denying their classification under CTH 62149060. The Tribunal also rejected misdeclaration allegations due to the lack of evidence, ultimately allowing all appeals in favor of the appellant based on the importance of accurate classification and burden of proof.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 21:59:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 998 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176493</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a customs classification dispute regarding imported goods initially declared as Polyester Ladies Stole. The Revenue&#039;s argument for classification under CTH 62149060 lacked concrete evidence of manmade fiber presence, leading the Tribunal to dismiss their claim. Additionally, the Tribunal emphasized the Revenue&#039;s failure to prove the presence of manmade fiber, denying their classification under CTH 62149060. The Tribunal also rejected misdeclaration allegations due to the lack of evidence, ultimately allowing all appeals in favor of the appellant based on the importance of accurate classification and burden of proof.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>