<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 999 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176503</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged various disallowances made by the assessing officer. The Tribunal found that the disallowance under section 14A of the Act was reduced to Rs. 10,000. Disallowances for Motor Car expenses, Travelling &amp;amp; Conveyance expenses, and Telephone expenses were upheld, with modifications to the percentages disallowed for Telephone expenses. The Tribunal adjusted the disallowances based on the facts presented, partially allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 21:59:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 999 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176503</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged various disallowances made by the assessing officer. The Tribunal found that the disallowance under section 14A of the Act was reduced to Rs. 10,000. Disallowances for Motor Car expenses, Travelling &amp;amp; Conveyance expenses, and Telephone expenses were upheld, with modifications to the percentages disallowed for Telephone expenses. The Tribunal adjusted the disallowances based on the facts presented, partially allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>