<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 845 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176501</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the Rs. 40 lakhs addition to the assessee&#039;s declared income. The Tribunal emphasized that deficit stock alone cannot be considered as income, especially when the assessee had already admitted additional income and maintained consistent gross profit levels. The lack of evidence and reconciliation by the Revenue further supported the deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 21:59:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 845 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176501</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the Rs. 40 lakhs addition to the assessee&#039;s declared income. The Tribunal emphasized that deficit stock alone cannot be considered as income, especially when the assessee had already admitted additional income and maintained consistent gross profit levels. The lack of evidence and reconciliation by the Revenue further supported the deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>