<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 936 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176466</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision rejecting the application for amendment of the Bill of Entry under Section 149 of the Customs Act. It held that the predeposit direction by the Commissioner (Appeals) was unsustainable and directed a reconsideration without insisting on predeposit. The appeal was allowed for further consideration without predeposit requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:18:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 936 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176466</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision rejecting the application for amendment of the Bill of Entry under Section 149 of the Customs Act. It held that the predeposit direction by the Commissioner (Appeals) was unsustainable and directed a reconsideration without insisting on predeposit. The appeal was allowed for further consideration without predeposit requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>