<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 75 - CESTAT,NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1621</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned where the earlier appeal had been rejected on a technical ground after defects were not cured, and the delay was explained by prolonged correspondence between the Registry and the Revenue. The application was allowed, reflecting that the delay was treated as satisfactorily accounted for on the facts stated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 75 - CESTAT,NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1621</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned where the earlier appeal had been rejected on a technical ground after defects were not cured, and the delay was explained by prolonged correspondence between the Registry and the Revenue. The application was allowed, reflecting that the delay was treated as satisfactorily accounted for on the facts stated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>