https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176462 A classification favouring reserve pool teachers was upheld because they had served during an institutional crisis, the distinction had an intelligible basis, and it bore a rational nexus to the object of maintaining continuity of education; Articles 14 and 16(1) were not violated. The earlier writ challenge was procedurally defective because directly affected persons were not properly impleaded and certiorari was not the correct relief to strike down legislation. Appointed reserve pool teachers were entitled to continue in service and be deemed confirmed, while the remaining teachers retained the statutory preference for appointment against future substantive direct-recruitment vacancies. en-us Fri, 27 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Dec 2015 14:30:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176462 A classification favouring reserve pool teachers was upheld because they had served during an institutional crisis, the distinction had an intelligible basis, and it bore a rational nexus to the object of maintaining continuity of education; Articles 14 and 16(1) were not violated. The earlier writ challenge was procedurally defective because directly affected persons were not properly impleaded and certiorari was not the correct relief to strike down legislation. Appointed reserve pool teachers were entitled to continue in service and be deemed confirmed, while the remaining teachers retained the statutory preference for appointment against future substantive direct-recruitment vacancies. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176462