<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1945 (1) TMI 18 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176458</link>
    <description>Income actually collected in British India on Cawnpore sales was treated as received there and therefore taxable under the charging provisions without apportionment between manufacture outside and sale within British India. The court also stated that the expression &quot;profits and gains&quot; referred to the ordinary commercial profit on sale. By contrast, sales to British India customers through independent brokers did not create a deemed accrual in British India, because the assessee had no branch, agency, or other establishment there and the brokers were not retained agents. The deeming rule was said to require a real, substantive business connection with a business in British India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 1945 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 13:28:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1945 (1) TMI 18 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176458</link>
      <description>Income actually collected in British India on Cawnpore sales was treated as received there and therefore taxable under the charging provisions without apportionment between manufacture outside and sale within British India. The court also stated that the expression &quot;profits and gains&quot; referred to the ordinary commercial profit on sale. By contrast, sales to British India customers through independent brokers did not create a deemed accrual in British India, because the assessee had no branch, agency, or other establishment there and the brokers were not retained agents. The deeming rule was said to require a real, substantive business connection with a business in British India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 1945 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>