https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176457 Wilful disobedience of an earlier Supreme Court judgment was examined in relation to land-use permissions for the disputed lands. The Court noted that title and ancillary land-use issues had already been finally resolved, so the authorities were bound to comply with the earlier directions in letter and spirit. Fresh objections, including restricting permission to non-residential use, were treated as an attempt to defeat the judgment and amounted to contempt. The Court found wilful contempt, required compliance with the earlier directions within four weeks, and declined to impose punishment while warning against future non-compliance. en-us Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Dec 2015 20:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176457 Wilful disobedience of an earlier Supreme Court judgment was examined in relation to land-use permissions for the disputed lands. The Court noted that title and ancillary land-use issues had already been finally resolved, so the authorities were bound to comply with the earlier directions in letter and spirit. Fresh objections, including restricting permission to non-residential use, were treated as an attempt to defeat the judgment and amounted to contempt. The Court found wilful contempt, required compliance with the earlier directions within four weeks, and declined to impose punishment while warning against future non-compliance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176457