<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 929 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176456</link>
    <description>An appeal may be dismissed where the appellant fails to comply with a lawful pre-deposit condition imposed for hearing the appeal. The text notes that the appellant was directed to deposit money as a condition precedent for waiver of pre-deposit, did not comply, and the appellate authority dismissed the appeal under the statutory pre-deposit requirement. No procedural irregularity or error was shown to justify interference, and the challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 13:20:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 929 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176456</link>
      <description>An appeal may be dismissed where the appellant fails to comply with a lawful pre-deposit condition imposed for hearing the appeal. The text notes that the appellant was directed to deposit money as a condition precedent for waiver of pre-deposit, did not comply, and the appellate authority dismissed the appeal under the statutory pre-deposit requirement. No procedural irregularity or error was shown to justify interference, and the challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>