<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 36 -  CESTAT,AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1618</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the &quot;Octopus 3-0 Tissue Stabilizer/Starfish Heart Positioner&quot; qualifies as a &quot;Vascular Clamp&quot; under Notification No. 17/2001-Cus based on expert opinions from medical professionals. The product&#039;s function aligns with stabilizing the vascular system during surgery, warranting exemption. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering technological advancements in medical equipment classification and set aside the previous order, granting relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 36 -  CESTAT,AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1618</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the &quot;Octopus 3-0 Tissue Stabilizer/Starfish Heart Positioner&quot; qualifies as a &quot;Vascular Clamp&quot; under Notification No. 17/2001-Cus based on expert opinions from medical professionals. The product&#039;s function aligns with stabilizing the vascular system during surgery, warranting exemption. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering technological advancements in medical equipment classification and set aside the previous order, granting relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>