<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 576 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176453</link>
    <description>Applying the principles in Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry v. Acer India Ltd., the SC found no infirmity in the impugned orders and saw no basis for judicial interference. The Court did not undertake any fresh reappraisal of facts or law beyond applying the cited precedent, and the civil appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:48:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 576 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176453</link>
      <description>Applying the principles in Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry v. Acer India Ltd., the SC found no infirmity in the impugned orders and saw no basis for judicial interference. The Court did not undertake any fresh reappraisal of facts or law beyond applying the cited precedent, and the civil appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>