<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 48 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1617</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the confirmation of duty demand and denial of exemption notifications for Material Handling Systems. The appellants successfully argued that the systems constituted immovable property once installed at the customer&#039;s premises, making them ineligible for duty. Citing relevant judgments, including those in similar cases, the Tribunal found that the entire system, with assembly and civil work, qualified as immovable property. Relying on precedents where conveyor systems were deemed immovable, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision and ruled in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 48 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1617</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the confirmation of duty demand and denial of exemption notifications for Material Handling Systems. The appellants successfully argued that the systems constituted immovable property once installed at the customer&#039;s premises, making them ineligible for duty. Citing relevant judgments, including those in similar cases, the Tribunal found that the entire system, with assembly and civil work, qualified as immovable property. Relying on precedents where conveyor systems were deemed immovable, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision and ruled in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>