<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>MFG UNIT DONE RM AS SUCH SALES WHETHER IT UNDER EXTRA DUTY 10% OF RM SALE VALUE PL CONFIRM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109591</link>
    <description>Removal of inputs as such by a manufacturer is not equivalent to trading merely because duty credit was passed; if such removals are not routine, departmental demands for additional levy are unsustainable and characterization depends on the regularity and commercial nature of the transactions rather than the mere passing of Cenvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:43:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>MFG UNIT DONE RM AS SUCH SALES WHETHER IT UNDER EXTRA DUTY 10% OF RM SALE VALUE PL CONFIRM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109591</link>
      <description>Removal of inputs as such by a manufacturer is not equivalent to trading merely because duty credit was passed; if such removals are not routine, departmental demands for additional levy are unsustainable and characterization depends on the regularity and commercial nature of the transactions rather than the mere passing of Cenvat credit.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:43:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>