<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Erythritol as a Food Additive Under 2011 Packaging and Labeling Regulations, Rejecting Reclassification Argument.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26546</link>
    <description>Import of Erythritol - Application of Food Safety and Standards (packaging and Labeling) Regulations, 2011 - the contention advanced by the petitioner that the goods in question &#039;Erythritol&#039; is used as a food additive in manufacture of the foods and cannot be termed as item which meets the personal needs of the consumers, is liable to be rejected outright - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:10:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Erythritol as a Food Additive Under 2011 Packaging and Labeling Regulations, Rejecting Reclassification Argument.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26546</link>
      <description>Import of Erythritol - Application of Food Safety and Standards (packaging and Labeling) Regulations, 2011 - the contention advanced by the petitioner that the goods in question &#039;Erythritol&#039; is used as a food additive in manufacture of the foods and cannot be termed as item which meets the personal needs of the consumers, is liable to be rejected outright - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:10:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>