<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1187 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269883</link>
    <description>The Court held that the receipt of compensation by the Assessee upon termination of the joint-venture agreement was a capital receipt but could not be taxed as capital gains due to the absence of provisions for determining the cost of acquisition of intangible assets at the relevant time. The Court ruled in favor of the Assessee, dismissing the appeal with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2016 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1187 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269883</link>
      <description>The Court held that the receipt of compensation by the Assessee upon termination of the joint-venture agreement was a capital receipt but could not be taxed as capital gains due to the absence of provisions for determining the cost of acquisition of intangible assets at the relevant time. The Court ruled in favor of the Assessee, dismissing the appeal with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>