<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1171 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269867</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s disallowance of freight and maintenance charges for non-deduction of tax was rejected as not pressed, confirming the lower authority&#039;s addition. The disallowance of the purchase of leather was overturned by the Tribunal due to the essential nature of leather purchases for the appellant&#039;s business and the supporting evidence provided. The disallowance of commission paid to foreign agents was also overturned as it was not deemed a fee for technical services, resulting in the deletion of the additional tax amount. The appeal was partly allowed, addressing various disallowance issues in the appellant&#039;s assessment for the year 2010-11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:47:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1171 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269867</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s disallowance of freight and maintenance charges for non-deduction of tax was rejected as not pressed, confirming the lower authority&#039;s addition. The disallowance of the purchase of leather was overturned by the Tribunal due to the essential nature of leather purchases for the appellant&#039;s business and the supporting evidence provided. The disallowance of commission paid to foreign agents was also overturned as it was not deemed a fee for technical services, resulting in the deletion of the additional tax amount. The appeal was partly allowed, addressing various disallowance issues in the appellant&#039;s assessment for the year 2010-11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>