https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269866 The Tribunal remanded several issues back to the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) for re-adjudication, including the adjustment of Rs. 1,88,83,489 in international transactions, denial of 5% range benefit, and classification of rental income. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to classify rental income as 'Income from House Property,' delete disallowances for payments to manufacturers, and reconsider interest calculations under various sections. Additionally, the Tribunal addressed issues of double taxation, adjustments to Arms Length Price, and directed the AO to provide detailed information for reconciling transactions with insurance companies and Form 26AS discrepancies. en-us Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:47:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269866 The Tribunal remanded several issues back to the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) for re-adjudication, including the adjustment of Rs. 1,88,83,489 in international transactions, denial of 5% range benefit, and classification of rental income. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to classify rental income as 'Income from House Property,' delete disallowances for payments to manufacturers, and reconsider interest calculations under various sections. Additionally, the Tribunal addressed issues of double taxation, adjustments to Arms Length Price, and directed the AO to provide detailed information for reconciling transactions with insurance companies and Form 26AS discrepancies. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269866