<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1169 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269865</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding the disallowance of excess expenditure claimed under section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal determined that the expenditure was aimed at mitigating losses of the borrower-company, not for generating income directly. Emphasizing the purpose of the expenditure and the nature of transactions, the Tribunal concluded that the claim lacked merit as it did not serve the primary goal of earning income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1169 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269865</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding the disallowance of excess expenditure claimed under section 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal determined that the expenditure was aimed at mitigating losses of the borrower-company, not for generating income directly. Emphasizing the purpose of the expenditure and the nature of transactions, the Tribunal concluded that the claim lacked merit as it did not serve the primary goal of earning income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>