<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1164 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269860</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld service tax demands and penalties due to deliberate short payment by the appellants for Security Agency Service. The Tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; claim of financial hardship as a reason for delayed payment, emphasizing the lack of malafide intention. However, the Tribunal granted the benefit of reduced penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, following a Gujarat High Court judgment, reducing the penalty amount in one appeal by 25% upon timely payment within 30 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1164 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269860</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld service tax demands and penalties due to deliberate short payment by the appellants for Security Agency Service. The Tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; claim of financial hardship as a reason for delayed payment, emphasizing the lack of malafide intention. However, the Tribunal granted the benefit of reduced penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, following a Gujarat High Court judgment, reducing the penalty amount in one appeal by 25% upon timely payment within 30 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>