https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269858 Service tax could not be demanded from an Indian recipient on reverse charge for taxable services received from abroad before 18.04.2006, so the demand and consequential penalties were set aside. By contrast, denial of Cenvat credit was upheld where the assessee failed to produce invoices or other supporting evidence showing tax payment and the nature of input services, and the appellate challenge was not substantiated. The result was partial relief: the reverse charge demand failed, but the credit-related demands remained in force. en-us Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269858 Service tax could not be demanded from an Indian recipient on reverse charge for taxable services received from abroad before 18.04.2006, so the demand and consequential penalties were set aside. By contrast, denial of Cenvat credit was upheld where the assessee failed to produce invoices or other supporting evidence showing tax payment and the nature of input services, and the appellate challenge was not substantiated. The result was partial relief: the reverse charge demand failed, but the credit-related demands remained in force. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269858