<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1150 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269846</link>
    <description>Virginiamycin imported as STAFAC 1000 was treated as a well-defined chemical of 100% purity with anti-bacterial properties, bringing it within Chapter 29 under Chapter Note 1(a). The competing classification as an animal-feed preparation under Chapter 23 was rejected because the goods were not a premix containing multiple additives. An earlier precedent was distinguished on that factual basis and held inapplicable to these goods. The classification adopted by the Tribunal was therefore rejected and the departmental view prevailed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1150 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269846</link>
      <description>Virginiamycin imported as STAFAC 1000 was treated as a well-defined chemical of 100% purity with anti-bacterial properties, bringing it within Chapter 29 under Chapter Note 1(a). The competing classification as an animal-feed preparation under Chapter 23 was rejected because the goods were not a premix containing multiple additives. An earlier precedent was distinguished on that factual basis and held inapplicable to these goods. The classification adopted by the Tribunal was therefore rejected and the departmental view prevailed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>