<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1142 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269838</link>
    <description>A 74-day delay in filing an appeal against a provisional release order was condoned because the appellant had already received the order and had repeatedly sought modification of the release conditions, while the record noted that no provision existed for such modification. The delay was nevertheless condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs. 25,000 within two weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:44:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1142 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269838</link>
      <description>A 74-day delay in filing an appeal against a provisional release order was condoned because the appellant had already received the order and had repeatedly sought modification of the release conditions, while the record noted that no provision existed for such modification. The delay was nevertheless condoned subject to payment of costs of Rs. 25,000 within two weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>