<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 905 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176440</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Section 50C does not apply to the transfer of tenancy rights, as it is specific to land or building. The AO&#039;s assessment based on the market value was deemed incorrect. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A). The appeal was decided in favor of the assessee on 27.11.2009.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 905 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176440</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Section 50C does not apply to the transfer of tenancy rights, as it is specific to land or building. The AO&#039;s assessment based on the market value was deemed incorrect. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A). The appeal was decided in favor of the assessee on 27.11.2009.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>