<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 496 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176436</link>
    <description>Article 226 relief is unavailable where the respondent is not a State, statutory body, or authority performing a public duty, and the dispute is only a contractual employment matter. An international institute established by agreement, funded mainly by foreign contributors, and not financially, functionally, or administratively dominated by the Government of India was treated as outside writ jurisdiction. Its research and training functions were held to be voluntary and not public duties owed to the Indian public. The contractual employment claim could not be enforced by writ, and the prayer against the Union of India was in substance a claim against the institute, with no specifically enforceable domestic right shown under the agreement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 17:16:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 496 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176436</link>
      <description>Article 226 relief is unavailable where the respondent is not a State, statutory body, or authority performing a public duty, and the dispute is only a contractual employment matter. An international institute established by agreement, funded mainly by foreign contributors, and not financially, functionally, or administratively dominated by the Government of India was treated as outside writ jurisdiction. Its research and training functions were held to be voluntary and not public duties owed to the Indian public. The contractual employment claim could not be enforced by writ, and the prayer against the Union of India was in substance a claim against the institute, with no specifically enforceable domestic right shown under the agreement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>