https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176432 The Tribunal's decision rested on its reliance on the Supreme Court ruling in Vikram Cement v. CCE, Indore and on the department's acceptance of similar outcomes in earlier years for the same assessee. The Bombay HC held that, in view of those factors, the appeal could not be entertained and rejected it without any further factual or legal adjudication. The operative effect was to leave the Tribunal's reliance on precedent and prior departmental consistency undisturbed. en-us Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Dec 2015 16:52:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176432 The Tribunal's decision rested on its reliance on the Supreme Court ruling in Vikram Cement v. CCE, Indore and on the department's acceptance of similar outcomes in earlier years for the same assessee. The Bombay HC held that, in view of those factors, the appeal could not be entertained and rejected it without any further factual or legal adjudication. The operative effect was to leave the Tribunal's reliance on precedent and prior departmental consistency undisturbed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176432