<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (9) TMI 41 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176429</link>
    <description>Temporary contractual engagements entered into while practising a profession do not become salary employment unless the professional has given up the profession and accepted permanent service. On the facts, the assessee remained a film actress and merely lent her services for individual films for limited periods, so the receipts were incidental to her profession. The amounts were therefore assessable as professional income under Section 10 and not as salary under Section 7.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 16:40:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (9) TMI 41 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176429</link>
      <description>Temporary contractual engagements entered into while practising a profession do not become salary employment unless the professional has given up the profession and accepted permanent service. On the facts, the assessee remained a film actress and merely lent her services for individual films for limited periods, so the receipts were incidental to her profession. The amounts were therefore assessable as professional income under Section 10 and not as salary under Section 7.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>