<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1063 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176421</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay should be approached liberally where the explanation is broadly acceptable and there is no gross negligence, deliberate inaction, or lack of bona fides. The Court held that an inadvertent error in the date stated in the condonation application was not enough to justify denial of a hearing on merits, especially when the explanation for delay was otherwise substantially accepted. The delay in filing the special appeal was therefore condoned, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the High Court for disposal on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2015 20:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1063 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176421</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay should be approached liberally where the explanation is broadly acceptable and there is no gross negligence, deliberate inaction, or lack of bona fides. The Court held that an inadvertent error in the date stated in the condonation application was not enough to justify denial of a hearing on merits, especially when the explanation for delay was otherwise substantially accepted. The delay in filing the special appeal was therefore condoned, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the High Court for disposal on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>