<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (12) TMI 71 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176412</link>
    <description>A limitation plea in a suit for dissolution of partnership, rendition of accounts and distribution of assets may fail where the running of time depends on disputed facts, including the date of dissolution, service of summons, or any acknowledgment affecting limitation. The article explains that such a plea is not a pure question of law and should not be determined for the first time in appeal without giving the affected parties an opportunity to respond, amend pleadings if needed, and have the relevant issues framed and decided on evidence. Appellate powers cannot cure the defect caused by deciding limitation without proper factual inquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:50:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (12) TMI 71 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176412</link>
      <description>A limitation plea in a suit for dissolution of partnership, rendition of accounts and distribution of assets may fail where the running of time depends on disputed facts, including the date of dissolution, service of summons, or any acknowledgment affecting limitation. The article explains that such a plea is not a pure question of law and should not be determined for the first time in appeal without giving the affected parties an opportunity to respond, amend pleadings if needed, and have the relevant issues framed and decided on evidence. Appellate powers cannot cure the defect caused by deciding limitation without proper factual inquiry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>