https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176412 Limitation in a suit for dissolution of a partnership at will, rendition of accounts and asset distribution depended on disputed facts, including the effective date of dissolution, service of summons in an earlier suit, and any acknowledgment affecting the running of time. A limitation plea could not be treated as a pure question of law and raised conclusively for the first time in appeal without allowing parties to respond, amend pleadings where necessary, and obtain findings on relevant facts. Reliance on one defendant's admission against all parties was improper. The suit was therefore not properly dismissed as time-barred, and the trial court's decree required restoration. en-us Mon, 17 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:50:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176412 Limitation in a suit for dissolution of a partnership at will, rendition of accounts and asset distribution depended on disputed facts, including the effective date of dissolution, service of summons in an earlier suit, and any acknowledgment affecting the running of time. A limitation plea could not be treated as a pure question of law and raised conclusively for the first time in appeal without allowing parties to respond, amend pleadings where necessary, and obtain findings on relevant facts. Reliance on one defendant's admission against all parties was improper. The suit was therefore not properly dismissed as time-barred, and the trial court's decree required restoration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Dec 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176412