<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 513 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176409</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal. Certain grounds were dismissed as not pressed, an additional ground of appeal was not admitted due to lack of reasons for omission, the computation of disallowance was upheld based on each trip, and the disallowance of advertisement expenses under section 37(3A) was confirmed. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions and upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:24:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 513 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176409</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal. Certain grounds were dismissed as not pressed, an additional ground of appeal was not admitted due to lack of reasons for omission, the computation of disallowance was upheld based on each trip, and the disallowance of advertisement expenses under section 37(3A) was confirmed. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions and upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>